Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Searles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Amy J Searles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
EDMONDS v. PMI MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT et al
as 1:2023cv01838
Plaintiff:
MIESHA ESCHELLE EDMONDS
Defendant:
PMI MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT, LON SEARLE and KENADI WATERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp Fed. Question: Violation of Due Process
Elzey v. Huntington County et al
as 1:2023cv00355
Plaintiff:
Kortney Lee Elzey
Defendant:
Huntington County, Indiana State of, Jennifer Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. SHEPHERD et al
as 1:2023cv01230
Plaintiff:
RANDY WILSON
Defendant:
JACKSON SHEPHERD, JOHN SEARLE and STEPHEN WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIDWELL v. SEARLES
as 1:2023cv00870
Plaintiff:
Chester Sidwell
Defendant:
Carly Searles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Searles v. Ohio
as 1:2022cv00083
Petitioner:
Tommy M Searles
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUNHAM v. KROGER FOOD STORE et al
as 1:2019cv01537
Defendant:
SEARLES, KROGER FOOD STORE and CITY OF COLUMBUS
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DUNHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. MYERS et al
as 1:2018cv02386
Defendant:
GREENLEE, SEARLES, STILLABOWER and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RIDDLE et al v. BATHOLOMEW COUNTY et al
as 1:2017cv03710
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY, BOOTH, OFFICER BUTLER and others
Plaintiff:
ANGELITO C. MERCADO and CHRISTOPHER RIDDLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv02519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
