Cases 71 - 80 of 296
M. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 3:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
M. M.
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
M. v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
as 4:2014cv00126
Plaintiff:
M. M.
Defendant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
David Baeza et al v. Amcord, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv08475
Defendant:
Amcord, Inc., Anthony and Sylvan Pools Corporation, Borg Warner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David Baeza and Vana Baeza
Haney v. Sears, Roebuck And Co. et al
as 3:2014cv00323
Plaintiff:
Monta S Haney
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck And Co. , SVP Worldwide, LLC , Electrolux North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 3:2014cv00593
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Plaintiff:
Linda Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
K., M. et al v. Husqvarna Consumer Outdoor Products, N.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00606
Plaintiff:
M. K. and Courtney Schroeder
Defendant:
Husqvarna Consumer Outdoor Products, N.A., Inc. and Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Solis v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2014cv00175
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Plaintiff:
Lupita M Solis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORGAN v. SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO. et al
as 2:2014cv05237
Plaintiff:
JASON MORGAN
Defendant:
SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO., SEARS HOLDINGS CORPORATION, SEARS STORES WATCHUNG #0001294 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cannon v. Sears Roebuck and Co et al
as 2:2014cv01560
Plaintiff:
Wayne Cannon
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck and Co , Orgill Inc and Truper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Alter v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv01285
Plaintiff:
David Alter
Defendant:
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc. and Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
