Cases 21 - 30 of 55
HUNTER v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 7:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
ERIC JEROME HUNTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3717
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUNTER v. U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT et al
as 7:2017cv00169
Petitioner:
ERIC JEROME HUNTER
Respondent:
U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, U.S. SECURITY AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
HUNTER v. U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2017cv01545
Petitioner:
ERIC JEROME HUNTER
Respondent:
U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, U.S. SECURITY AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gregory Bartko v. DOJ, et al
as 16-5333
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gregory Bartko
Defendant - Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Securities and Exchange Commission, United States Postal Inspection Service and others
Ulysses Ware v. Rachel Chapa, et al
as 16-41429
Petitioner - Appellant:
ULYSSES T. WARE
Respondent - Appellee:
RACHEL CHAPA, K. BOWERS, J. JONES and others
Ware v. Chapa et al
as 1:2016cv00389
Petitioner:
Ulysses T Ware
Respondent:
Rachel Chapa, K Bowers, J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joseph Blimline v. Thirty Unknown Employees, et al
as 16-10067
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH S. BLIMLINE
Defendant - Appellee:
THIRTY UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and FIFTEEN UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
