Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Seneca Foods Corporation v. United States
as 1:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Seneca Foods Corporation
Defendant:
United States
Not Yet Classified:
United States Steel Corporation
Selkey Buhl, LLC v. Seneca Foods Corporation
as 1:2020cv00247
Plaintiff:
Selkey Buhl, LLC
Defendant:
Seneca Foods Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv02425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Rene Robles v. Seneca Foods Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv02552
Defendant:
DOES, Seneca Foods Corporation and Reason Timothy Sheffield
Plaintiff:
Rene Robles
Bert Galloway v. William Gardinier, et al
as 16-6790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BERT JEROME GALLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM P. GARDINIER, Director of Consumer Affairs and SENECA FOODS CORPORATION
Galloway v. Gardinier et al
as 2:2016cv02663
Plaintiff:
Bert Jerome Galloway
Defendant:
William P. Gardinier and Seneca Foods Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie, Afton v. Seneca Foods Corporation
as 3:2016cv00049
Plaintiff:
Afton McKenzie
Defendant:
Seneca Foods Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 1473 v. Seneca Foods Corporation
as 3:2016cv00035
Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 1473
Defendant:
Seneca Foods Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Riewestahl, Dana v. Seneca Foods Corporation
as 3:2015cv00805
Plaintiff:
Dana O. Riewestahl
Defendant:
Seneca Foods Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Western Wings Corp. v. Seneca Foods Corporation
as 1:2013cv00134
Plaintiff:
Western Wings Corp.
Defendant:
Seneca Foods Corporation and Westfield Aviation, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Seneca Foods Corporation
Thirdparty_defendant:
Westfield Aviation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
