Cases 1 - 10 of 25
HARRIS v. TRAFICANTE et al
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HARRIS
Defendant:
ASHLEY TRAFICANTE, SETH ERICKSON, (FIRST NAME UNK.) CARLSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CULMER v. SCI - HOUTZDALE et al
as 3:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE LAMONT CULMER
Defendant:
SCI - HOUTZDALE, SETH DANIEL BURGGRAF, OFFICER YACKULICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
FERGUSON v. HOLLOMAN CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv01832
Plaintiff:
SETH FERGUSON
Defendant:
HOLLOMAN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUSH et al v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. RUSH, RAHIEM FANT, JORDAN BATTY, SR. and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
HICKOX v. TICE et al
as 3:2020cv00161
Defendant:
ZACHARY MOSLAK, MELANIE PYLE, ERIC TICE and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN HICKOX
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. AMBROSE et al
as 2:2020cv00603
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, JOHN DOE, II, EDWARD STRAWN and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY GARRETT BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ANSYS, INC. v. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES et al
as 2:2020cv00488
Defendant:
DOES 1 THROUGH 10, SVETLANA VASEY, AKHIL SETH and others
Plaintiff:
ANSYS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
GIBSON V. ERICKSON, et al
as 2:2019cv00357
Defendant:
SCI FAYETTE PRISON OFFICIALS, SETH ERICKSON and MARK CAPPOZZA
Plaintiff:
CURTIS L. GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ATANACIO-REYES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv00275
Defendant:
SKILMAN, Lt. DICKEY, SCOTT RIDDLE and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS ATANACIO-REYES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
GREEN et al v. BASS FISHING & RENTALS, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01740
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GREEN , SETH KRENZELAK , JOSHUA HAWK and others
Defendant:
BASS FISHING & RENTALS, LLC and STEVEN JOHNSTON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
