Cases 1 - 10 of 245
Ojeda v. Mendez
as 22-2700
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Angelo Ojeda and Carmen Rosa Torres Ojeda
Defendant / Appellee:
Alfonso Mendez, Police Officer, Badge #7899, Police Benevolent Association, Bill De Blasio, Mayor, City of New York, State of New York and others
Defendant:
New York Police Department, Internal Affairs Bureau, Zaki Isaac Tamir, Esq. and others
Ojeda et al v. Mendez et al
as 1:2020cv03910
Plaintiff:
Carmen Rosa Torres Ojeda and Michael Angelo Ojeda
Defendant:
Zaki Isaac Tamir, New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, Sylvia Ash and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ojeda et al v. Mendez et al
as 2:2020cv01615
Plaintiff:
Carmen Rosa Torres Ojeda and Michael Angelo Ojeda
Defendant:
Zaki Isaac Tamir, New York City Department of Consumer Affairs, Sylvia Ash and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
John Custin v. Harold Wirths, et al
as 20-1837
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH SIEBER, N.J. BOARD OF REVIEW, HAROLD J. WIRTHS, STATE OF NEW JERSEY COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, HILDA S. SOLIS SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN M. CUSTIN
Defendant:
HILDA S. SOLIS SECRETARY OF EMPLOYMENT & LABOR and HILDA S. SOLIS UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Stewart Liff, et al v. Office of Inspector General, et al
as 16-5370
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Stewart Liff and Stewart Liff & Associates, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Office of Personnel Management and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel Petrole, former Inspector General of the Office of the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Labor, in his individual and/or official capacities, Seth D. Harris, former Deputy Secretary for the U.S. Department of Labor, in his individual and/or official capacities and M. John Berry, former Director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, in his individual and/or official capacity
Stewart Liff, et al v. Office of Inspector General, et al
as 16-5045
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Stewart Liff and Stewart Liff & Associates, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Office of Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Office of Personnel Management and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel Petrole, former Inspector General of the Office of the Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Labor, in his individual and/or official capacities, Seth D. Harris, former Deputy Secretary for the U.S. Department of Labor, in his individual and/or official capacities and M. John Berry, former Director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, in his individual and/or official capacity
Timothy Ozinga, et al v. Sylvia Burwell, et al
as 15-3648
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY OZINGA, PAUL OZINGA, AARON OZINGA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SYLVIA MATHEWS BURWELL, In her official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, JACOB J. LEW, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury and SETH D. HARRIS, in his official capacity as Deputy Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor
Dim Njaka v. Michael D. Kennedy, et al
as 14-3515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dim Njaka
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael D. Kennedy, Pamela-Jeanne Moran, Dana K. Bilyeu and others
JEFFERSON v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2014cv01247
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND M. JEFFERSON
Defendant:
SETH D. HARRIS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DANIEL PETROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
LIFF et al v. OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al
as 1:2014cv01162
Plaintiff:
STEWART LIFF and STEWART LIFF & ASSOCIATES, INC
Defendant:
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL FOR THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
