Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Robinson v. Robinson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00257
Plaintiff: Robert W Robinson
Defendant: Carol A Robinson and Tami P Sexton
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 3005 Detention of Mail for Temporary Periods
Gila River Indian Community v. Cranford et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00407
Defendant: Eva Schoebroek, Joyce Cranford, Donna Sexton and others
Plaintiff: Gila River Indian Community
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sexton v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv04408
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff: David J Sexton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boles v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv02712
Defendant: Sherri Lauritano, Phoenix Police Department Professional Standards Bureau, Michael Walker and others
Plaintiff: Sky Boles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steele v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv00936
Plaintiff: Shaun L Steele
Defendant: Paul Penzone, Unknown Ramirez, Travis Chance and others
Movant: Santina L Sexton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sexton v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01164
Plaintiff: Lewanna Sexton
Defendant: C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sexton v. Peoria, City of et al
as 2:2016cv02144
Plaintiff: Carl R Sexton
Defendant: Peoria, City of , Roy Minter , Unknown Minter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sexton v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv01519
Plaintiff: Wendy Lee Sexton
Defendant: Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Sexton v. Conn Appliances Incorporated
as 2:2016cv00207
Plaintiff: Judy Sexton
Defendant: Conn Appliances Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Sexton #261888 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2014cv01984
Petitioner: Jeffrey Lynn Sexton
Respondent: Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?