Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Ford v. Dart et al
as 1:2012cv04000
Plaintiff:
Bobby L. Ford
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Director Miller, Ms. Hickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Anderson et al
as 1:2012cv01066
Plaintiff:
Rodney Hunter
Defendant:
Sgt. Anderson, Lt. Macweather and Officer Primous
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Bacchus v. Lt. Scarborough
as 11-7254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BACCHUS
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. SCARBOROUGH, LT. RICHARDSON, LT. ROGERS and others
David Bacchus v. Lt. Scarborough
as 11-6440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BACCHUS
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. SCARBOROUGH, LT. RICHARDSON, LT. ROGERS and others
Titus Thomas v. Officer Allgood
as 11-6105
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TITUS THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER ALLGOOD, OFFICER VINE, GEORGE T. GREGORY, Hearing Officer and others
Bacchus v. Scarborough et al
as 6:2010cv02857
Plaintiff:
David Bacchus
Defendant:
Lt Scarborough, Lt Richardson, Lt Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lonnie Gholson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 10-6157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE MODENENAN GHOLSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, (Mr. Mark Davis; Mr. James Gilmore), COUNTY OF WISE and others
Gholson v. The Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2010cv00005
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Modenenan Gholson
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Virginia, The Virginia Attorney General, The County of Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Stanley Pigott v. Corrections Corporation, et al
as 09-1192
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Stanley Pigott
Defendant - Appellee:
Corrections Corporation of America, Timothy Wengler, Warden, G. Andrews, Officer at Corrections Corporation of America and others
Uhde v. Wallace
as 3:2007cv00714
Plaintiff:
Douglas Uhde
Defendant:
Pam Wallace, Thomas Karlen, MATTHEW FRANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
