Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Williams v. Runyon et al
as 4:2019cv04134
Defendant:
Nurse Chelsie, Sgt. Griffie, C.O. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Arron Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TREADWELL v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00235
Plaintiff:
DEANTHONY TREADWELL and DAVID JAMALSON
Defendant:
LT DAVIS, LIEUTENANT RONNIE SHOEMAKER, MCCRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Norris et al
as 3:2014cv00309
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel G. Hannah
Defendant:
Lt. Norris, Sgt. Griffis, Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Florida Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00313
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel G. Hannah
Defendant:
Florida Department Of Corrections, Lt. Norris, Sgt. Griffis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Union Correctional et al
as 3:2013cv00738
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel G. Hannah
Defendant:
Union Correctional, Lt. Norris, Sgt. Griffis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hannah v. Norris et al
as 3:2012cv01280
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Hannah
Defendant:
Lt. Norris, Sgt. Griffis, Co. Hodson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hannah v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2012cv00577
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel G. Hannah
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Lt. Norris, Sgt. Griffis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hannah v. Norris et al
as 8:2012cv00974
Plaintiff:
N. G. Hannah
Defendant:
Lt. Norris, Co. Hodson, Sgt. Griffis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Nathaniel Hannah v. Lt. Norris, et al
as 12-12001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATHANIEL G. HANNAH
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. NORRIS, SGT. GRIFFIS, CO HUDSON and others
Hannah v. Norris et al
as 3:2011cv00929
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel G. Hannah
Defendant:
Lt. Norris, Sgt. Griffis, CO Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
