Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rehman et al v. Newrez, LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al
as 5:2026cv00405
Plaintiff:
Barber Rehman and Uzma Shafi
Defendant:
Newrez, LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and Nationstar Mortgage, LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv04134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2025cv10357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv01438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Shafi v. DoorDash, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv06773
Plaintiff:
RONAK N. SHAFI
Defendant:
DoorDash, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
SHAFI v. UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
as 1:2025cv01618
Plaintiff:
TAMOOR SHAFI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Moeinzadeh v. Shafi-Scagliarini
as 1:2025cv03659
Plaintiff:
MARIAM MOEINZADEH
Defendant:
AZRA SHAFI-SCAGLIARINI and Azra Zyneb Shafi-Schelierini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
