Cases 11 - 20 of 251
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-11445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
FOSTER v. WARD et al
as 5:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
JOHN M FOSTER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY C WARD, WILKES, WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, STEVE UPON and others
ASBERRY v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMISSIONER et al
as 5:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY ASBERRY
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS COMMISSIONER, ROBERT TOOLE, JACK RANDALL SAULS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
MARTIN et al v. HOLT et al
as 5:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Judge BEVERLY B MARTIN, Khalid Mouton and BEVERLY B MARTIN
Defendant:
PO AHMED HOLT, ROBERT TOOLE, STAN SHEPARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cassady v. Ward et al
as 1:2022cv05060
Plaintiff:
Dana Marie Cassady and David Dwayne Cassady
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Sharon Lewis, Dr. Cleary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-30670
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mark Hilderbrand v. Sharon Lewis, et al
as 22-13446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK ANDREW HILDERBRAND
Defendant / Appellee:
SHARON LEWIS, SHARON BROWN, EDWARDS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
