Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Ronald Boone, Sr., et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 11-56704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BOONE, Sr., SHARON MOSBY, Estate of Ronald Boone and ESTATE OF RONALD EULICE BOONE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHARLES BECK, in his official capacity and others
Ronald Boone, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
as 11-55705
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD BOONE, On Behalf of Themselves and as Executors of the Estate of their son Ronald Eulice Boone and SHARON MOSBY, On Behalf of Themselves and as Executors of the Estate of their son, Ronald Eulice Boone
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a Public Entity; Each of the following are sued individually and as an agent/employee of the City of Los Angeles and JERRITT SEVERNS, LAPD Officer
Ronald Boone Sr. et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv00617
Plaintiff:
Ronald Boone, Sr. and Sharon Mosby
Defendant:
William Bratton, City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles and others
Ronald Boone v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2009cv01894
Plaintiff:
Ronald Boone and Sharon Mosby
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does and Jerritt Severns
Cross Defendant:
California Hospital Medical Center and Roes
Cross Claimant:
City of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
REESE v. CITY OF EAST ORANGE et al
as 2:2007cv01899
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE REESE
Defendant:
CITY OF EAST ORANGE, THE CITY OF EAST ORANGE POLICE DEPARTMENT, JAMES MOSS and others
Cross Claimant:
EAST ORANGE GENERAL HOSPITAL, LASHAWN V. KEARSE, CITY OF EAST ORANGE and others
Cross Defendant:
EAST ORANGE GENERAL HOSPITAL, EAST ORANGE GENERAL HOSPITAL, RUCHI AMIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mosby v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2007cv00021
Plaintiff:
Sharon Mosby
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
