Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Billy Burge, Jr. v. Doe, et al
as 26-2196
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Burge, Jr.
Defendant:
Doe and Sharp County Detention Center
Virgil v. Sharp County Detention Center et al
as 3:2025cv00259
Plaintiff:
Dametrius Virgil
Defendant:
Sharp County Detention Center, Edith Elliott, Shane Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eason v. Sharp County Detention Center et al
as 3:2025cv00258
Plaintiff:
Tony A Eason
Defendant:
Sharp County Detention Center, Edith Elliott, Shane Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hiley v. Russell et al
as 3:2025cv00257
Plaintiff:
Adrian Lamar Hiley
Defendant:
Shane Russell, Edith Elliott, Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamaker v. Sharp County, Arkansas
as 3:2025cv00202
Plaintiff:
Keith Hamaker
Defendant:
Sharp County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Burge v. Doe et al
as 3:2025cv00184
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Burge, Jr
Defendant:
Doe and Sharp County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Sharp County, Arkansas et al
as 3:2023cv00112
Plaintiff:
Amber Walker
Defendant:
Sharp County, Arkansas, Stephen Davis, Mark A Counts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Thornton v. Sharp County Detention Center et al
as 3:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Richard Thornton
Defendant:
Sharp County Detention Center and Edith Elliot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Hart et al
as 4:2021cv00017
Defendant:
Kristi Keitz, Sharp County Sheriff Department, Tamara Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Neal, Jr II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Sharp County Sheriff Department
as 3:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Sharp County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Neal, Jr II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
