Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Michael Logering, et al v. Morrison Co. Sheriff's Office, et al
as 23-2376
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael David Logering and Wendy Ann Acker
Defendant / Appellee:
Morrison County Sheriff's Office, Shawn Larsen, Sheriff; in capacity of Morrison County Sheriff's Department, Jason McDonald, Deputy; in capacity of Morrison County Sheriff's Department and others
Defendant:
Eric Hanneken, Chief of Police; in capacity of Morrison County Sheriff's Department, Calvin Tschida, Officer; in capacity of Pierz Police Department under direction from Morrison County Sheriff's Department primary officer on scene, Brad Bordwell and others
Logering et al v. Morrison County Sheriff's Department et al
as 0:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Michael David Logering, Wendy Acker and Wendy Ann Acker
Defendant:
Morrison County Sheriff's Department, Shawn Larsen, Jason McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelash v. Mille Lacs County et al
as 0:2022cv02717
Plaintiff:
Sharon-theresa Kelash
Defendant:
Mille Lacs County, Tristen, Don Lorge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adam Hageman v. Morrison Co. Sheriff's Office, et al
as 20-1152
Defendant / Appellee:
Jenny Orth, Correctional Officer, Darci Okerman, Administrative Assistant, Morrison County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adam R. Hageman
Hageman v. Morrison County Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2018cv01005
Plaintiff:
Adam R. Hageman
Defendant:
Morrison County Sheriff's Office, Shawn Larsen, Scott MacKissock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford et al v. Lewis et al
as 2:2011cv01220
Plaintiff:
National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford and Transportation Insurance Company
Defendant:
Richard Jay Lewis, Lisa Hara Levin-Lewis, Advanced Cardiac Specialists, Chartered and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
