Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Darla Acton et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05055
Plaintiff:
Angle Clark, Tia Robbins, Darla Acton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Acton et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00844
Plaintiff:
Angle Clark, Tia Robbins, Darla Acton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Acton et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00844
Plaintiff:
Acton, Angle Clark, Tia Robbins and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
POWELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40962
Plaintiff:
SHAWN POWELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KANN v. ESHELEMAN et al
as 5:2017cv00455
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY KANN
Defendant:
CRAIG ESHELEMAN , JOHN FIORILL, ADAM CRAMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kann v. Esheleman et al
as 1:2017cv00168
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Kann
Defendant:
Craig Esheleman, John Fiorill, Adam Cramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Werner Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04549
Plaintiff:
Shawn Powell
Defendant:
Werner Enterprises, Inc. and Charles Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Estate of Ahmed M. Guled v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2014cv04674
Plaintiff:
Estate of Ahmed M. Guled
Defendant:
Minneapolis, City of, Shawn Powell, Jeffrey Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amos et al v. Joiner et al
as 6:2014cv02344
Plaintiff:
Mattie Amos, Shawn Powell, Madilyn Powell and others
Defendant:
Rodney Joiner , International Fidelity Insurance Co , Stan Hardee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Guled v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2014cv01897
Plaintiff:
Ahmed M. Guled
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis, Shawn Powell, Jeffrey Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
