Cases 1 - 10 of 48
SHAY v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv00281
Petitioner:
KEVIN R. SHAY
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT ZAKEN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shay v. Wahl et al
as 3:2022cv01157
Petitioner:
Eric W. Shay
Respondent:
Mark Wahl and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sweat v. South Carolina
as 2:2022cv01865
Petitioner:
Jeremy Shay Sweat
Respondent:
South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Black v. Hatcher
as 4:2021cv00288
Petitioner:
Jerome Wilson Black, Jr
Respondent:
Sally Hatcher and Shay Hatcher
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHAY v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2020cv01447
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN
Petitioner:
KEVIN R. SHAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLACK v. HATCHER
as 4:2020cv00177
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent:
Shay Hatcher
Petitioner:
JEROME W BLACK, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BLACK v. HATCHER
as 4:2020cv00163
Respondent:
Warden SHAY HATCHER
Petitioner:
JEROME W BLACK, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anthony v. HATCHER
as 1:2020cv00124
Petitioner:
Danny Lorenzo Anthony
Defendant:
Warden SHAY HATCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ANTHONY v. HATCHER
as 4:2020cv00151
Respondent:
Warden SHAY HATCHER
Petitioner:
DANNY LORENZO ANTHONY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHAY v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2020cv00657
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, SUPERINTENDENT ZAKEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
KEVIN R. SHAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
