Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Michael Holmes v. Bobby Lee Garrett, et al
as 17-1309
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Michael James Holmes
Defendant:
Mayor Francis G. Slay, In his official capacity as a member of the Board of Police Commissioners of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department., Bettye Battle-Turner, In her official capacity as a member of the Board of Police Commissioners of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, Col. Richard Gray, In his official capacity as a member of the Board of Police Commissioners of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Bobby Lee Garrett, In his official capacity as a member of the Board of Police Commissioners of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department nd individually and Shell Sharp, In his official capacity as a member of the Board of Police Commissioners of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, and individually.
Holmes v. Slay et al
as 4:2012cv02333
Plaintiff:
Michael Holmes
Defendant:
Francis G. Slay , Bettye Battle-Turner , Richard Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Slay et al
as 4:2012cv02109
Plaintiff:
Stephen Jones
Defendant:
Francis Slay, Bettye Battle-Turner, Richard Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffrey Crawford v. Don Isom, et al
as 12-2360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeffrey Lamar Crawford
Defendant - Appellee:
Don Isom, Chief, Janice Bockstruck, Supervisor, Shell Sharp, Law enforcement officer and others
Crawford et al v. Isom et al
as 4:2011cv01517
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lamar Crawford
Defendant:
Dan Isom, Janice Bockstruck, Shell Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Babbitt v. St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 4:2009cv00737
Plaintiff:
Stanley Babbitt
Defendant:
St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department, William Poats, Shell Sharp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
