Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Boldrini v. Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing et al
as 3:2023cv01615
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Defendant:
Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing as New Rez LLC aka New Penn Financial LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Services, Michael Niccolini, Lisa M. Gelb and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Myong Oh v. Reconstrust Company, NA, et al
as 22-55711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYONG SUK OH, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
RECONSTRUST COMPANY, NA, a US corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., an American worldwide banking and financial service holding company commonly known as BNY Mellon, MTC FINANCIAL, INC., a California corporation, DBA Trustee Corps and others
Almyr Guimaraes v. Beatrice Butchko, et al
as 22-10697
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALMYR GUIMARAES
Defendant / Appellee:
BEATRICE BUTCHKO, MICHAEL A. HANZAN, TROMBERG MORRIS & POULIN PLLC and others
Guimaraes v. Butchko et al
as 1:2022cv20033
Plaintiff:
Almyr Guimaraes
Defendant:
Beatrice Butchko, Michael A. Hanzan, Tromberg, Morris & Poulin Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Myong Suk Oh v. Reconstrust Company, N.A, et al
as 8:2021cv01808
Plaintiff:
MYONG SUK OH
Defendant:
RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a subsidiary of BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Boldrini v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 3:2019cv00563
Defendant:
Lesa Gelb, Dave Ritter, Chase Home Finance LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Antonello Boldrini
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
HOOD et al v. VICTORIA CROSSING TOWNHOUSE ASSOCIATION INC et al
as 1:2018cv12259
Defendant:
DEBRA A. LAFFERTY, NEW PENN FINANCIAL, LLC d/b/a SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING, BRIGANTINE REALTY, INC and others
Plaintiff:
LISA HOOD, DAVID HOOD III, DAVID HOOD SR and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Patrick Joseph Soria et al
as 2:2018cv03041
Defendant:
George Wesley Pierce, Jr., Rebekah Brown, Westwood Legal and others
Plaintiff:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for The Holders of the First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-FF10 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-FF10
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC, Temporary Receiver and Robb Evans and Associates LLC
Interested Party:
Robert West, Morgan Picks Two LLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee Formerly Known as Bankers Trust Company of California, N.A., Not in its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee, or its Permitted Successors and Assig and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Marina Ivanoff
Intervenor:
Selene Finance, Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Select Portfolio Services, LLC and others
Intervenor Defendant:
All Persons Unknown Claiming any Legal or Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien or Interest in The Subject Property Located at 390 South Sepulveda Boulevard Unit 208, Los Angeles, California 90049, APN, Kimberly L Yamada-Tung, Christina Gifford and others
Petitioner:
Garson Silvers, DNE Associates, a CA general partnership, The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders CWMBS, Inc CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-HYB4, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-HYB4 and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Century 21 Citrus Realty and Albert Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tashjian v. Minnick et al
as 4:2017cv40117
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Tashjian
Defendant:
Dennis Minnick, Sr. , David McGrath , Korde & Associates, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Gale Smith v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 17-2169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GALE L. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CHASE BANK USA, N.A., J.P. MORGAN CHASE AND COMPANY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
