Cases 31 - 40 of 97
In re: Mack Shelton
as 19-5445
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: MACK J. SHELTON
Sweeney et al v. Crigler et al
as 2:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Marilyn Howard, Dwight Sears, Emily Shelton and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Hugenberg, Ann Cormican, Joshua Gilpin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Kenneth Shelton v. J Barnhart
as 19-5194
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH E. SHELTON
Respondent / Appellee:
J.A. BARNHART, Warden
Hunter et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 2:2019cv10345
Plaintiff:
Paula Wheeler, John Purcell, Clarence M. Titlow and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch, LLC, VM Motori S.p.A., Robert Bosch GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Damond Roker v. Moore, et al
as 19-5091
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT A. BARNETT, in his/her individual and official capacity, HEARING OFFICER NEWTON, in his/her individual and official capacity, ROBERT L. MOORE, Chief Jailer, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMOND JULIAN ROKER
SHELTON et al v. DIRECT ENERGY, LP, et al
as 1:2019cv00081
Defendant:
Kaa Energy, Inc. and Direct Energy, LP
Plaintiff:
Jon Frey and James Everett Shelton
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
James Shelton v. USA
as 19-5025
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES MATTHEW SHELTON
Powell v. Shelton et al
as 1:2018cv00128
Defendant:
Mackie Shelton and Barry Dyer
Plaintiff:
Valerie Powell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Anculle et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv00308
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Kraujalis, Priscilla A. Blackburn, Malibu K. Messer and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Modi v. Envision Healthcare Corporation et al
as 3:2018cv00648
Defendant:
Christopher A. Holden, Joey A. Jacobs, Carol J. Burt and others
Plaintiff:
Anirudh Modi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
