Cases 31 - 40 of 229
Walker v. Scott et al
as 1:2022cv01546
Petitioner:
Frankie N. Walker
Respondent:
Gregg Scott and Josh Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fields et al v. Liberty Health Care Corporation et al
as 4:2022cv04050
Plaintiff:
Justin Fields, Dothan K Rogers, Lester J Collier and others
Defendant:
Liberty Health Care Corporation, Steve Bryant, Josh Shelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 3:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Cindy Shelton
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Corporation, Village of Bonnie and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shelton v. Griffith et al
as 3:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Teresa M Shelton
Defendant:
Bradley Griffith, Jr., Ronald Colburn, Bennie Vick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Benoite v. Cioli et al
as 3:2021cv50436
Petitioner:
Shelton John Benoite
Respondent:
A. Cioli and SMU Program
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shelton v. Mary et al
as 3:2021cv01261
Plaintiff:
Maurice Shelton
Defendant:
Ms. Mary, Aramark and St. Clair County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Hollaway et al
as 1:2021cv03918
Plaintiff:
Marquis E Shelton
Defendant:
Amanda Hollaway and Kenneth Wilburn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Kraft Heinz Foods Company
as 3:2021cv00799
Plaintiff:
Emma Shelton
Defendant:
Kraft Heinz Foods Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boyd v. City of Country Club Hills et al
as 1:2021cv02472
Defendant:
City of Country Club Hills, Police Officer Ronald Shelton and Police Officer Katrina Meletis
Plaintiff:
Madeline Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. SuperValu Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00408
Defendant:
SuperValu Inc. and United Natural Foods, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tayler Shelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
