Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Shelton et al v. MRIGlobal et al
as 1:2011cv02891
Plaintiff:
David M. Shelton and DesignSense, Inc.
Defendant:
MRIGlobal and Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc. v. Cherokee Ventures & Investments, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2011cv00990
Plaintiff:
Smoothie King Franchises, Inc.
Defendant:
Cherokee Ventures & Investments, L.L.C. and Kellie Shelton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
We Hold These Truths Limited v. Shelton
as 2:2010cv02659
Plaintiff:
We Hold These Truths Limited
Defendant:
Jason Shelton
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Three Angels Broadcasting Netw, et al v. Joy, et al
as 09-2615
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THREE ANGELS BROADCASTING NETWORK, INC., an Illinois Non-Profit Corporation and DANNY LEE SHELTON
Defendant - Appellant:
GAILON ARTHUR JOY and ROBERT PICKLE
Shelby Shelton Inc et al v. Franz-Jeans-Lazo-Cora & Associates Inc et al
as 4:2009cv00437
Plaintiff:
Shelby Shelton Inc and Brett Shelby Shelton
Defendant:
Franz-Jeanes-Lazo-Cora & Associates Inc and William E Franz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Heartbilt Homes, Inc. v. Shelton et al
as 3:2009cv50014
Plaintiff:
Heartbilt Homes, Inc., Heartbilt Homes, Inc., Heartbilt Homes, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Stewart Shelton, Michael Schlichting, Edward Wand and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Three Angels Broadcasting Netw, et al v. Joy, et al
as 08-2457
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THREE ANGELS BROADCASTING NETWORK, INC., an Illinois Non-Profit Corporation and DANNY LEE SHELTON
Defendant - Appellant:
GAILON ARTHUR JOY and ROBERT PICKLE
White v. Forty Acres and a Mule Filmworks, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00001
Plaintiff:
James Lee White, III
Defendant:
Forty Acres and a Mule Filmworks, Inc., Showtime Networks, Inc., CBS Viacom and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
