Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Stockton v. Shelton
as 4:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Shelton, Joe Page, III, L Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Brockman et al
as 4:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Shelton Dickerson
Defendant:
Brockman, Huffman, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv04013
Plaintiff:
John M Nichols
Defendant:
Daisy Smith, Karen Ghromley and Correctional Officer Cameron Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolgamott v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv04012
Plaintiff:
Chase E Wolgamott
Defendant:
Daisy Smith, Karen Ghromley and Correctional Officer Cameron Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dybalski v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv04011
Plaintiff:
Garrett H Dybalski
Defendant:
Daisy Smith, Karen Ghromley and Correctional Officer Cameron Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
John M Nichols
Defendant:
Daisy Smith, Karen Ghromley and Cameron Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolgamott v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
Chase E Wolgamott
Defendant:
Daisy Smith, Karen Ghromley and Cameron Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dybalski v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Garrett H Dybalski
Defendant:
Daisy Smith, Karen Ghromley and Cameron Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Sifuentes
as 4:2022cv01144
Plaintiff:
Dan A Shelton, Jr
Defendant:
Anthony Sifuentes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Washington et al
as 4:2022cv01131
Plaintiff:
Virgil Clayborn Shelton, Jr
Defendant:
Washington, Dexter Payne, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
