Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rosa v. TFRM et al
as 4:2023cv01046
Defendant:
Linda Mohrmann, TFRM, Mark Jaycox and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Rosa
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
USA v. Shepherd
as 6:2023cv03225
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Terriance Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Hornbeck v. Archdiocese of St. Louis et al
as 4:2023cv00245
Defendant:
Catholic Charities of St. Louis, Archdiocese of St. Louis, Fr. Alexander Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Hornbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shepherd v. USA
as 4:2022cv00473
Petitioner:
Robert E Shepherd
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shepherd v. USA
as 4:2022cv00313
Petitioner:
Robert E Shepherd
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shepherd v. Hudson
as 4:2022cv00239
Petitioner:
Robert E Shepherd
Respondent:
Donald Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hornbeck v. Archdiocese of St. Louis et al
as 4:2022cv00345
Defendant:
Good Shepherd Children and Family Services, Catholic Charities of St. Louis, Archdiocese of St. Louis and others
Plaintiff:
Christian Hornbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Dorr et al
as 4:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Samuel H. Williams
Defendant:
District Court Judge Dorr, District Court Judge Kays, Eighth Circuit Court Judge Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duvall v. Bringer Shepherd et al
as 2:2021cv00039
Defendant:
James aka Jimmy W Shinn, Rachel Bringer Shepherd, Doe and others
Plaintiff:
John C. Duvall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
