Cases 1 - 9 of 9
AUSTIN v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
EZRA SHERMAN HENRY AUSTIN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
AUSTIN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv01958
Plaintiff:
EZRA SHERMAN HENRY AUSTIN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Henry et al v. United States of America d/b/a Memphis VA Medical Center et al
as 2:2016cv02206
Plaintiff:
Sherman Henry , Dorothy Henry and Rebecca Dowty
Defendant:
United States of America d/b/a Memphis VA Medical Center and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Henry v. Santana et al
as 1:2015cv08574
Plaintiff:
Sherman Henry
Defendant:
Gregory Santana, Fabrizio Randazzo and City Of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv00909
Plaintiff:
Sherman Henry
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Jeffrey SanJuan, Gregory Santana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry v. American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees et al
as 1:2013cv24090
Defendant:
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Council 79 and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
Plaintiff:
Sherman Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henry v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv00238
Petitioner:
Sherman Henry
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff and Immigration & Customs Enforcement Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henry v. Chertoff et al
as 1:2007cv00238
Petitioner:
Sherman Henry
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff and Immigration & Customs Enforcement Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henry v. Chertoff et al
as 2:2007cv00358
Petitioner:
Sherman Henry
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff and Director of Detention and Removal United States, Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
