Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Reaves v. Michel et al
as 4:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Wesley Adam Reaves
Defendant:
Ben Michel, David Menotti and Shiloh Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Northport Health Services of Arkansas LLC et al v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 5:2019cv05168
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Seema Verma and others
Plaintiff:
NWA Nursing Center, LLC, Northport Health Services of Arkansas, LLC, Atkins Care Center, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Arkansas Trial Lawyers Association, American Association for Justice, Justice in Aging and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
HCA-Information Technology & Services Inc v. Shiloh Health Services Inc et al
as 4:2012mc00012
Plaintiff:
HCA-Information Technology & Services Inc
Defendant:
Shiloh Health Services Inc and Medical Park Hospital
Garnishee:
Arvest Bank
HCA-Information Technology & Services, Inc. v. Shiloh Health Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2010mc00003
Plaintiff:
HCA-Information Technology & Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Shiloh Health Services, Inc. and Medical Park Hospital
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Brown v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2010cv03027
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Brown
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services, Kurt Knickrehm, John Selig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Arkansas Department of Human Services et al
as 4:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Brown
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Human Services, Kurt Knickrehm, John Selig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. 10100 Shiloh Road, Crawford County, Arkansas
as 2:2007cv02049
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
10100 Shiloh Road, Crawford County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
