Cases 51 - 60 of 66
Lee v. Cir Law Offices et al
as 5:2011cv01570
Plaintiff:
Shiu P Lee
Defendant:
Cir Law Offices and Unifund CCR Partners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Chan et al v. One West Bank, FSB et al
as 2:2011cv00399
Plaintiff:
Yuk Lan Chan and Shiu Po Cheung
Defendant:
NDeX West LLC and One West Bank, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Shiu et al v. New Peking Taste Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01175
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, Gen Xu Shu, Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Dan Feng Lin and Man Wei Shiu
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Shiu v. 11/49 Realty, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00311
Plaintiff:
Richard Shiu
Defendant:
11/49 Realty, LLC and Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00811
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., v. SOLIS et al
as 1:2009cv02009
Plaintiff:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
Defendant:
HILDA L. SOLIS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, PATRICIA A. SHIU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
USA v. Shiu Tam
as 09-50390
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SHIU KEI SAMUEL TAM
DeBruyn Produce Company, Inc. v. Ban-N-Sons Produce, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv03148
Plaintiff:
DeBruyn Produce Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Ban-N-Sons Inc., Melissa Chan-Ng, Shiu Ban Chan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shiu v. Busch, III et al
as 4:2008cv01119
Plaintiff:
Man Foon Shiu
Defendant:
August Busch, III, August Busch, IV, James Forese and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Zeno v. Shiu Fung Fireworks Company, Ltd. et al
as 2:2007cv07635
Plaintiff:
Charmaniquea Zeno
Defendant:
Shiu Fung Fireworks Company, Ltd., Zenith Specialties, L.P., Zenith Specialties, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
