Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Shorty v. Housing Authority of the County of DeKalb et al
as 1:2026cv06062
Plaintiff:
Angela Shorty
Defendant:
Housing Authority of the County of DeKalb and David Siegel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
US v. James Smith
as 26-6478
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JAMES SMITH, a/k/a Little Rock, a/k/a Shorty Stupid
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv20021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Truesdale & Govensky LLC et al
as 4:2025cv01156
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Truesdale & Govensky LLC doing business as 40s & Shortys doing business as 40's & Shortys doing business as 40's & Shorty's and Justin Govensky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Howard, et al. v. United States Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 25-3766
Plaintiff:
MARIE HOWARD, RICHARD SHORTY and LILLY WILSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OFFICE OF NAVAJO AND HOPI INDIAN RELOCATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 25-6363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shorty v. Hill et al
as 3:2025cv00656
Plaintiff:
Aerick Wayne Shorty
Defendant:
A. Ramirez and E. Estrada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fred Shorty v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv01782
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Fred Shorty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PALMER v. FORD et al
as 1:2025cv00034
Plaintiff:
DANA MICHELLE PALMER and MINOR CHILD
Defendant:
AIJALON FORD, CANDRUM ROYAL, NEYOSKI JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Rivera (Amador Rivera)
as 24-3305
Defendant:
JOSE TORRES, WILLIAM ALBERT, RAMON COLLAZO and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
