Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Pimenta
as 2:2023cv00612
Plaintiff:
Pedro Da Silva Pimenta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pimenta et al v. Thornton et al
as 2:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
Pedro Da Silva Pimenta, Heather Staples and Pedro Miguel Da Silva Pimenta
Defendant:
City of Eclectic, Charles Thornton and Charles T. Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Silva v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 5:2021cv01396
Plaintiff:
Joe Della Silva
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Stokes v. Danzey et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2021cv00467
Plaintiff:
Vantwain L. Stokes
Defendant:
Spencer W. Danzey, Will Maddox, Troy Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv08000
Petitioner:
Sergio Motuto Silva
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Silva v. Apex Roofing and Restoration LLC et al
as 5:2019cv01598
Defendant:
Cullman Casting Corporation, Apex Roofing and Restoration LLC and WW Restoration LLC
Plaintiff:
Ladislao Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Silva et al v. Dale et al
as 6:2019cv00135
Plaintiff:
Leone Silva, Ernesto Anacleto, Jose Hernandez and others
Defendant:
RD and S Communications Resources LLC, Graycliff Enterprises Inc and Robert Dale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parsons v. Maddox et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2016cv00120
Plaintiff:
Brian Jake Parsons
Defendant:
William K. Maddox, Troy Silva, Lee Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parsons v. Maddox et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2016cv00103
Plaintiff:
Brian Jake Parsons
Defendant:
William K. Maddox, Troy Silva, Lee Padgett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv02319
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
