Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Cagle v. Ransom et al
as 5:2023ct03287
Plaintiff:
Daniel L. Cagle
Defendant:
G. Ransom, J. Hunt, Marie Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinclair v. Rivera et al
as 5:2023ct03180
Plaintiff:
James T. Sinclair
Defendant:
Officer Rivera, Officer Brothers, Officer Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinclair v. White et al
as 5:2023ct03054
Plaintiff:
James T. Sinclair
Defendant:
Unit Manager White, Captain Applewhite, Sgt. Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYSTIC RETREAT MED SPA & WEIGHT LOSS CENTER et al v. ZELTIQ AESTHETICS LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00515
Defendant:
ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC, ALLERGAN USA, INC. and ZELTIQ AESTHETICS LLC
Plaintiff:
MYSTIC RETREAT MED SPA & WEIGHT LOSS CENTER and MISTY SINCLAIR, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wright v. State of North Carolina
as 3:2021cv00163
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Petitioner:
Quintin Sinclair Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sinclair v. City of Lumberton et al
as 7:2020cv00185
Defendant:
Patrick Lewis, Randy Canady, John/Jane Doe insurance company C and others
Plaintiff:
John Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CASPER v. SINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv00455
Defendant:
SINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP, INC. , ABC WCTI 12 , RICHARD REINGOLD and others
Plaintiff:
CRAVEN RANDALL CASPER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511
Campbell v. Teter et al
as 1:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Richard Lamar Campbell
Defendant:
Shirley Teter and Sinclair Communications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01089
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Sealed Defendant v. USA
as 7:2016cv00299
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Vincent Sinclair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
