Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Washington v. David L Moss et al
as 4:2023cv00560
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Washington and Jermaine Torrey Washington
Defendant:
David L Moss, Marcus Major Berry, D O Sixkiller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fitts et al v. Newberry et al
as 4:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Colby Blake Fitts and Kayla Nicole Fitts
Defendant:
Don Newberry, Amy Strahan, Tiffany McDaniels Acting Head Teller doing business as Madison County Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Citizens for Clean Air et al v. Regan et al
as 2:2022cv01382
Plaintiff:
Citizens for Clean Air and Sierra Club
Defendant:
Michael S. Regan and Casey Sixkiller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7604 Clear Air Act (Emission Standards)
Sixkiller v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Donnie Gene Sixkiller
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SIXKILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv03149
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRENT SIXKILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Hawkins et al
as 1:2019cv03730
Defendant:
Kelly, Sixkiller, Wargo and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stephen Edwards v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al
as 19-15997
Defendant / Appellee:
TIM R. POMEROY, AZB #032966, CLEAR RECON CORPORATION, LAURA SIXKILLER, Individual Az Bar (022014) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN S. EDWARDS
Edwards v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 2:2018cv04040
Plaintiff:
Stephen S Edwards
Defendant:
Laura Sixkiller, Unknown Parties, PHH Mortgage Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Johnson v. Hawkins et al
as 1:2018cv02227
Defendant:
Kelly, Malanado, Hawkins and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
