Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Via Vadis Controlling GmbH v. Skype Inc. et al
as 1:2012mc00193
Petitioner:
Via Vadis Controlling GmbH
Respondent:
Skype Inc. , Skype Communications SARL , Skype Global SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Via Vadis LLC v. Skype Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00507
Plaintiff:
Via Vadis LLC
Defendant:
Skype Inc. , Skype Communications SARL, Skype Global SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
VIA VADIS, LLC v. SKYPE, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00306
Plaintiff:
VIA VADIS, LLC
Defendant:
SKYPE, Inc., SKYPE Communications Sarl, SKYPE Global Sarl and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
IN RE SKYPE
as 10-M945
Respondent:
Net2Phone, Inc., Net2Phone, Inc., Net2Phone, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Skype Technologies SA, Skype, Inc., Skype Technologies SA and others
NET2PHONE, INC. v. EBAY, INC. et al
as 4:2010cv04090
Plaintiff:
Net2Phone, Inc.
Defendant:
EBAY, INC. , SKYPE TECHNOLOGIES SA , SKYPE, INC. and others
Counter_claimant:
EBAY, INC. , SKYPE TECHNOLOGIES SA and SKYPE, INC.
Counter_defendant:
Net2Phone, Inc.
Movant:
HOWARD S. JONAS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Robert Townsend v. Skype Inc et al
as 8:2010cv00161
Defendant:
Does, Ebay Inc, Silver Lake Investment Group, Delaware Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Townsend
Barker et al v. Skype Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01364
Plaintiff:
Holly Barker, Holly Barker, Brian Carness and others
Defendant:
Skype Inc, Skype Delaware Holdings Inc, Skype Communications SARL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Eidos Communications LLC et al v. Skype Technologies SA et al
as 1:2009cv00234
Plaintiff:
Eidos Communications LLC and Message Routes LLC
Defendant:
Skype Technologies SA and Skype Incorporated
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PEER COMMUNICATIONS V SKYPE TECH
as 09-1069
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Peer Communications Corporation
Defendant-Appellee:
Skype Technologies SA, Skype, Inc. and eBay, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
