Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CONTENTS OF JP MORGAN CHASE ACCOUNT ENDING IN 9483 IN THE NAME OF JAE CHOI ATTORNEY TRUST ACCOUNT et al
as 2:2024cv05863
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CONTENTS OF JP MORGAN CHASE ACCOUNT ENDING IN 9483 IN THE NAME OF JAE CHOI ATTORNEY TRUST ACCOUNT, CONTENTS OF BANK OF AMERICA ACCOUNT ENDING IN 4685 IN THE NAME OF SMART LEARNING, INC., CONTENTS OF JP MORGAN CHASE ACCOUNT ENDING IN 0711 IN THE NAME OF HEE AH NAM and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $75,601.00 in United States Currency, et al.
as 1:2019cv00934
Defendant: One 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS VIN 2G1FK1EJ2A9184370, One 2004 Hummer - H2 VIN 5GRGN23U44H114888, 65" LG Smart LED Television Model OLED65C8PUA and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Currency et al
as 2:2018cv02125
Defendant: Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Gary H. Smart
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. $70,932.00 United States Currency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00245
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $70,932.00 United States Currency, One Blue 2015 Ford F150 XLT, One Blue 1966 Ford Thunderbird and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. $43,266.66 United States Currency et al
as 1:2015cv00882
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $43,266.66 United States Currency, One 2014 Can-Am Outlander 650 Max XT All-Terrain Vehicle and Look Trailer and One 75" Samsung Ultra HD Smart Television
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
In Re: Bracco Diagnostics Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00100
Defendant: Bracco Diagnostics Inc., Med-Smart Inc., Nevada Heart & Vascular Center (RESH) LLP and others
In Re: Bracco Diagnostics Litigation
Plaintiff: Ellen McCrory and Robert McCrory
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. A TOTAL OF $263,791.59 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY COMPRISED OF: et al
as 2:2014cv06165
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: A TOTAL OF $263,791.59 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY COMPRISED OF, $62,000.00 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN CAPITAL ONE BANK SMART SAVINGS ACCOUNT NUMBER 7150826874, $61,791.59 PREVIOUSLY CONTAINED IN CAPITAL ONE BANK SMART SAVINGS ACCOUNT NUMBER 7150826866 and others
Claimant: Frank Furfaro , Christina Furfaro , Allison Furfaro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. Twenty Eight Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty ($28,830.00) Dollars in United States Currency et al
as 2:2012cv00852
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Twenty Eight Thousand Eight Hundred Thirty ($28,830.00) Dollars in United States Currency, Twenty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety ($24,990.00) Dollars in United States Currency, 46'' Sony Bravia 3D LED HD Television, Serial No. 8000908 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Funds in the Amount of $174,000.00
as 1:2011cv06698
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Funds in the Amount of $174,000.00
Claimant: Aaron M. Smart
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Four Real Properties Commonly Known as 814 Pitt Avenue, Springfield, Robertson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv00138
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Four Real Properties Commonly Known as 814 Pitt Avenue, Springfield, Robertson County, Tennessee, 4676 Highway 41N, Springfield, Tennessee, 204 Lawrence Lane, Springfield, Tennessee and others
Claimant: Marie Murphy, in her capacity as Special Deputy Commissioner of Commerce and Insurance for the State of Tennessee, and as Statutory Liquidator/Receiver of Smart Data Solutions, LLC, et. al , F&M Bank , Bart S Posey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?