Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv02269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Riches v. Smithfield Foods Inc et al
as 6:2008cv01409
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Smithfield Foods Inc and FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McNeil et al v. Smithfield Foods, Inc. et al
as 7:2008cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jerome McNeil and Sidney L Townsend
Defendant:
Smithfield Foods, Inc. and Smithfield Packing Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Parker et al v. Smithfield Foods, Inc. et al
as 7:2007cv00176
Plaintiff:
Jerry Parker, Wilbert Tatum, Dannie King, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Smithfield Foods, Inc., Smithfield Packing Company, Inc., Premium Standard Farms, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Smithfield Food, Inc. et al v. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union et al
as 3:2007cv00641
Plaintiff:
Smithfield Food, Inc., Smithfield Food, Inc., Smithfield Food, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, United Food and Commercial Workers Local No. 400, Change To Win and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Smithfield Foods, Inc. v. National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00625
Plaintiff:
Smithfield Foods, Inc.
Defendant:
National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Martinez-Hernandez et al v. Butterball, LLC et al
as 5:2007cv00174
Defendant:
Carolina Turkeys Carolina Turkeys, Smithfield Foods Inc Smithfield Foods Incorporated, Maxwell Farms, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
Richard Ward, Cheyney Hales, Keith Nye and others
Plaintiff:
Ulda Aponte and Liliana Martinez-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
