Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
AWKO-0004 v. Roblox Corporation et al
as 3:2026cv07396
Plaintiff: AWKO-0004
Defendant: Roblox Corporation and Snapchat, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Simpson v. SnapChat, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2026cv00188
Plaintiff: Willie Lemont Simpson, Jr.
Defendant: SnapChat, Inc., Jacqueline Pettit and Steven Pettit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Victor
as 25-2188
Petitioner: DANIELLE VICTOR
Respondent: UNITED STATES, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
In Re: Victor
as 25-1758
Petitioner: DANIELLE VICTOR
Respondent: UNITED STATES, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
In Re: Victor
as 25-1685
Petitioner: DANIELLE VICTOR
Respondent: UNITED STATES, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Elam v. SnapChat Inc., et al.
as 25-4107
Plaintiff: ERIC JORDAN ELAM
Defendant: SNAPCHAT INC., VERIZON WIRELESS and META PLATFORMS, INC., DBA Instagram
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2025cv05471
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Victor v. Apple Inc., et al
as 25-1564
Plaintiff: DANIELLE VICTOR
Defendant: APPLE INC., a California Corporation, UNITED STATES, REFINITIV GLOBAL MARKETS, INC. and others
In Re: Victor
as 25-1561
Petitioner: DANIELLE VICTOR
Respondent: APPLE INC., a California Corporation, UNITED STATES, ROBERT BONTA, in their full capacity as Attorney General of the States of California and others
In Re: Victor
as 25-1554
Petitioner: DANIELLE VICTOR
Respondent: APPLE INC., a California Corporation, UNITED STATES, ROBERT BONTA, in their full capacity as Attorney General of the States of California and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?