Cases 1 - 10 of 14
RICHARDSON v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
TREY RICHARDSON
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, BRANDY LEEK, ANTHONY BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2023cv00570
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LEE JOHNSON
Defendant:
TRICIA PRETORIUS, DUSHAW ZATECKY, SARAH SNOWDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARTSOCK v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HARTSOCK
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, ROBERT BUPREY, BRANDY LEEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. SNOWDEN et al
as 2:2023cv00436
Plaintiff:
BARRY EDWARDS
Defendant:
SARAH SNOWDEN, CENTURION, BRANDY LEEK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCLURE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MCCLURE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, JAMES BASINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. SNOWDEN
as 1:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE CLARK
Defendant:
ERIC SNOWDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK v. SNOWDEN
as 4:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE CLARK
Defendant:
ERIC SNOWDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK v. SNOWDEN et al
as 1:2022cv00272
Plaintiff:
ROBERT CLARK
Defendant:
ERIC SNOWDEN, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPT. and CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS IND.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SNOWDEN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2021cv00299
Plaintiff:
OREN SNOWDEN
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, B. LAMMER, J DEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taulbee v. Starke County Indiana et al
as 3:2019cv00911
Defendant:
Starke County Indiana, Charles Chesak, Kathy Norem and others
Plaintiff:
Tammie Taulbee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
