Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Talley v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, MHM, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SOKOL v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2022cv06986
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Plaintiff:
STACY SOKOL
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS U.S.A., INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC., TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS, INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lawrence v. Tyme Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01133
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence
Defendant:
Tyme Technologies, Inc., Douglas A. Michels, Christine D. Baker and others
IRWIN v. TYME TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv04727
Plaintiff:
JAMES IRWIN
Defendant:
TYME TECHNOLOGIES, INC., DOUGLAS A. MICHELS, CHRISTINE D. BAKER and others
SOKOL v. WALMART, INC et al
as 3:2022cv04438
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA SOKOL
Defendant:
WALMART, INC, ABC COMPANY (1-10) and JOHN DOE (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
SAMPSON v. SOKOL
as 2:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E SAMPSON
Defendant:
MARK SOKOL
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv16758
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DEAN v. BUZAS et al
as 2:2021cv00968
Plaintiff:
STEVIE DUANE DEAN, JR.
Defendant:
AL STEVEN BUZAS, KAREN SOKOL, JOSEPH SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
RIECO v. BUZZAS et al
as 2:2021cv00007
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER MR. GUYTON, JOHN DAVID HOOD, III, C/O2 HARAUSE and others
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE L. RIECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
