Cases 1 - 10 of 100
An v. Virginia Commonwealth University
as 3:2026cv00666
Plaintiff:
Seon-Sook An
Defendant:
Virginia Commonwealth University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Williams v. KOIN 6 TV et al
as 3:2026cv01210
Plaintiff:
Amberly M. Williams
Defendant:
KOIN 6 TV, Perry Sook, McMinnville News-Register Publishing Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
In re: Hoid
as 26-1111
Petitioner:
In re: EDWARD HOID
Respondent:
JASON MALTERUD, JEFF SATUR, JOSHUA BURKE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Hoid (PS) v. Malterud et al
as 1:2026cv01358
Plaintiff:
Edward Herbert Hoid
Defendant:
Jason Malterud, Jeff Satur, Joshua Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Samsung E&C America, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv00634
Plaintiff:
Hyun Sook Lee
Defendant:
Samsung C&T Corporation and Samsung E&C America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Dawn Stevens v. Eui Sook Jun et al
as 2:2026cv01192
Plaintiff:
Dawn Stevens
Defendant:
Etehad L.L.C., Eui Sook Jun doing business as Victoria Wigs & Beauty Supply and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
