Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Cenk Uygur v. South Carolina Democratic Party
as 24-1052
Plaintiff:
CENK UYGUR and JOHN WARD
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA, HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina, ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina and others
Uygur et al v. South Carolina et al
as 3:2023cv06879
Plaintiff:
Cenk Uygur and John Ward
Defendant:
South Carolina, Henry McMaster, Alan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kylon Middleton v. Marci Andino
as 20-2022
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES H. LUCAS, Speaker of the South Carolina House of Representatives and HARVEY PEELER, in his capacity as President of the South Carolina Senate
Defendant / Appellant:
SCOTT MOSELEY, in his official capacity as member of the South Carolina Election Commission, MARCI ANDINO, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the South Carolina State Election Commission, JOHN WELLS, in his official capacity as Chair of the South Carolina State Election Commission and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AMOS WELLS, ERNESTINE MOORE, TONYA WINBUSH and others
Intervenor:
SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY
South Carolina Democratic Party et al v. Andino et al
as 3:2019cv03308
Defendant:
Clifford J Edler, Scott Moseley, Marci Andino and others
Plaintiff:
DSCC, South Carolina Democratic Party and DCCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
De La Fuente v. South Carolina Democratic Party et al
as 3:2016cv00322
Plaintiff:
Roque De La Fuente
Defendant:
South Carolina Democratic Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. South Carolina Democratic Party, The et al
as 3:2010cv00203
Plaintiff:
Brian Ryan B Doyle
Defendant:
South Carolina Democratic Party, The, Carol Fowler, Jay Parmley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
