Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Nathan Carroll v. Northampton Restaurants, Inc.
as 24-1354
Plaintiff:
NATHAN E. CARROLL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, GERALDINE P. CORRIGAN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, CRYSTAL A. BATEMAN and others
Defendant:
NORTHAMPTON RESTAURANTS, INC., d/b/a Aberdeen Barn Steakhouse
SPAID v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv01053
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW SPAID
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Spence v. McCorkle et al
as 2:2023cv00953
Plaintiff:
Gerald Spence
Defendant:
McCorkle, Spaid, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spaid v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv15223
Plaintiff:
Mark Spaid
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Spaid v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv02034
Plaintiff:
Lori Spaid
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SPAID v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv12872
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JASON S SPAID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gardner v. Spaid et al
as 3:2018cv03317
Defendant:
J Maddox and J. Spaid
Plaintiff:
Fabian Gardner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 99 Pension Fund v. Spaid Mechanical, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01555
Plaintiff:
Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 99 Pension Fund
Defendant:
Spaid Mechanical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Wilson v. Griffin et al
as 3:2016cv02071
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wilson
Defendant:
Christine Griffin, Richard Spaide, Sharon Luquis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
