Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Moore v. Sproul et al
as 3:2017cv05727
Petitioner:
William G Moore
Respondent:
D Sproul and Charles Samuel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sproule v. Taylor et al
as 2:2016cv01592
Respondent:
Eastern Oregon Correctional Facility and Jeri Taylor
Unknown:
Lynn David Larsen and Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Douglas O. Sproule
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis #195873 v. Robertson et al
as 2:2016cv02533
Plaintiff:
Philip Davis
Defendant:
Pat Robertson, Katie Souza, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henrik Fisker v. Aston Martin Lagonda Limited et al
as 8:2016cv00002
Defendant:
Aston Martin Lagonda Limited, Aston Martin Lagonda of North America Inc, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Henrik Fisker
Sproule v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv01427
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Deborah Marie Sproule
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Anderson et al v. Everest National Insurance Company et al
as 3:2013cv08017
Defendant:
Everest National Insurance Company , Allied World National Assurance Company , Chartis Specialty Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
James Anderson , Jane Anderson , Richard Ayersman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Sproul v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv01000
Plaintiff:
Terri L. Sproul
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
In re: Frank Sproul
as 11-80109
Respondent:
In re: FRANK P. SPROULS, Attorney, Admitted to the bar of the Ninth Circuit: February 9, 1995,
Mills et al v. RM International, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00129
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Copeland, David Gibbs, Rodney Johnson and others
Defendant:
Daimler Trucks North America LLC, James Keyes, RM International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
