Cases 51 - 60 of 185
Jacob Goldner v. St. Jude Medical Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09223
Defendant:
Does and St. Jude Medical Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jacob Goldner
Ward et al v. St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv23412
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc. , St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Does1-100
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Ward and Kraig F Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCCAIN v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
as 1:2015cv01390
Plaintiff:
SUSAN MCCAIN
Defendant:
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al v. Biotronik SE & Co. KG et al
as 0:2015cv03134
Plaintiff:
St. Jude Medical, Inc. and St. Jude Medical S.C., Inc.
Defendant:
Biotronik SE & Co. KG, Biotronik, Inc. , Max Schaldach, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Patton et al v. Boston Scientific Corp
as 5:2015cv01976
Plaintiff:
Minor S Patton, Jr and Lana Patton
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp, Abbott Laboratories and St Jude Medical Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Marmol v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.
as 8:2015cv01276
Plaintiff:
Delio Marmol
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GIANNONE v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02035
Plaintiff:
JAMES V. GIANNONE
Defendant:
ST. JUDE MEDICAL INC. , ST. JUDE MEDICAL CARDIAC RHYTHMIC MANAGEMENT DIVISION , FRANK FOE (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SIEBOLD v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
as 0:2015cv60079
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SIEBOLD
Defendant:
ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clancy v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv50378
Plaintiff:
Todd D Clancy
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Pacesetter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baker et al v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10313
Plaintiff:
Darrell Baker and Carol Baker
Defendant:
St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Pacesetter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
