Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Gardner v. Employbridge Southeast LLC
as 3:2022cv01780
Plaintiff:
Randall Gardner
Defendant:
Employbridge Southeast LLC and Employbridge Southeast LLC doing business as Staffing Solutions Southeast, Inc. doing business as Prologistix
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv19610
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv19602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simmons v. Staffing Solutions Southeast, Inc.
as 1:2020cv03716
Defendant:
Staffing Solutions Southeast, Inc. d/b/a Prologistix and Staffing Solutions Southeast, Inc. doing business as Prologistix
Plaintiff:
Keith Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sharp v. Technicolor Videocassette of Michigan, Inc., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02325
Plaintiff:
Robert Sharp
Defendant:
Technicolor Videocassette of Michigan, Inc. and Staffing Solutions Southeast, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Conner, et al v. Advantage Human Resourcing, Inc., et al (JRG2)
as 1:2016cv00406
Defendant:
Advantage Human Resourcing, Inc. , Staffing Solutions Southeast, Inc. and ThyssenKrupp Industrial Services NA, Inc
Plaintiff:
Monick M Conner and Derrick L English
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wyms v. Staffing Solutions Southeast, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00643
Plaintiff:
Harold Wyms
Defendant:
Staffing Solutions Southeast, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
