Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Stallone v. Kopp
as 2:2023cv07865
Petitioner:
Jerome Stallone
Respondent:
Marilyn Kopp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker et al v. New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision et al
as 9:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Carlton Walker and Jermell Mclean
Defendant:
New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision, Anthony J. Annucci, Brian Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. Molinero et al
as 1:2022cv01036
Plaintiff:
Pierre Jordan
Defendant:
. Molinero, . Renzi, Melvin Hinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bey v. Hart et al
as 2:2019cv06324
Defendant:
3rd Precint P.O. Stallone (6731), 3rd Precint PO Stallone, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Tralik Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stallone v. Bowyer et al
as 4:2019cv01212
Defendant:
Bill Bowyer, Melanie Coffman, Paul Blair and others
Plaintiff:
Virgil A. Stallone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faircloth et al v. Bowyer et al
as 4:2019cv01188
Defendant:
Teri Lawson, Bill Bowyer, Melanie Coffman and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Reed, Virgil A. Stallone, Lester Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stallone v. USA
as 1:2019cv00128
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sharon Marie Stallone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tuszynski v. Stallone
as 17-2170
Petitioner - Appellant:
David F. Tuszynski
Respondent - Appellee:
David Stallone, Department of Corrections Cayuga Correctional Facility
Stein v. Stallone
as 9:2017cv00670
Petitioner:
Christopher Stein
Respondent:
David Stallone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. McKoy et al
as 9:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Bornallah Wright
Defendant:
Jeff McKoy, Anthony Annucci, Cheryl Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
