Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rogers v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00248
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Blount County, Mark Moon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stanfield Corporation v. Blackboard Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv01664
Plaintiff:
Stanfield Corporation a/k/a Stanfield Inc, d/b/a Stanfield's Steakhouse
Defendant:
Blackboard Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Berry et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 6:2021cv01379
Plaintiff:
Berry, Dana Berry, Emily Culver and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc. and Apple Inc
Rogers v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2021cv01065
Plaintiff:
Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Oneonta, City of, Charles Clifton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Berry et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00488
Plaintiff:
Dana Berry, Emily Culver, Lisa Shehee and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Stanfield v. Thomas et al
as 1:2017cv01825
Petitioner:
Edgar Lee Stanfield
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and Alabama Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Poag et al v. City of Florence Alabama et al
as 3:2016cv01088
Plaintiff:
Luanna Poag , William Robert Harry and Miriam Ann Haney
Defendant:
City of Florence Alabama , Guy Lambert , Jeff Stanfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanfield v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00907
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Stanfield
Defendant:
Dr. Darbouze, Corrections Medical Services and Dr. Hood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanfield v. Darbouze et al (INMATE 2)(CONSENT)
as 2:2013cv00452
Plaintiff:
Billy Wayne Stanfield
Defendant:
Dr. Darbouze and Correctional Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanfield et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2011cv03832
Plaintiff:
Gloria M Stanfield , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
