Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Sean Buford, et al v. CAM2 International L.L.C., et al
as 23-8010
Respondent: Sean Buford, Arkansas Eastern, 1:19-cv-00082, Terry Zornes, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257, Adam Sevy, Kansas, 2:19-cv-02257 and others
Not Classified By Court: William James, Missouri Western, 3:19-cv-05089, Duane Fosdick, California Eastern, 2:19-cv-01850, Ellen Allicks, Illinois Central, 2:20-cv-02177 and others
Petitioner: CAM2 International L.L.C. and Smitty's Supply, Inc.
United States of America v. Brant
as 22-2620
Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: Richard Williams, Terrel Smith, AKA Rell, Stanley Richardson and others
Defendant / Appellant: El-Taiheed Brant, AKA Smurf
Theodore Wesby, et al v. DC, et al
as 20-7117
Defendant / Appellee: District of Columbia, Andre Parker, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities, J. Newman, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Sidney A. Banks, Jr., Alissa Cole, James Davis and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Antoinette Colbert, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Ethelbert D. Louis
Interested Party: Gregory L. Lattimer
Theodore Wesby, et al v. DC, et al
as 16-7079
Plaintiff - Appellee: Theodore Wesby, Alissa Cole, Anthony Maurice Hood and others
Defendant - Appellant: District of Columbia, Edwin Espinosa, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities, J. Newman, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities and others
Theodore Wesby, et al v. DC, et al
as 13-7029
Plaintiff - Appellee: Theodore Wesby, Alissa Cole, Anthony Maurice Hood and others
Defendant - Appellant: District of Columbia, Anthony Campanale, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities and Andre Parker, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities
Defendant - Appellee: Edwin Espinosa, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities, J. Newman, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities and Faraz Khan, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities
Theodore Wesby, et al v. DC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-7127
Plaintiff - Appellee: Theodore Wesby, Alissa Cole, Anthony Maurice Hood and others
Defendant - Appellant: District of Columbia, Anthony Campanale, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities and Andre Parker, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities
Defendant - Appellee: Edwin Espinosa, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities, J. Newman, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities and Faraz Khan, Officer - Metropolitan Police Department, in both his official and individual capacities
Speciale v. Richardson
as 1:2012cv07492
Plaintiff: Tony Speciale
Defendant: Stanley Richardson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Fair v. Richardson
as 2:2009cv00111
Plaintiff: Alicia Fair
Defendant: Stanley Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Richardson v. Tecnologica Avanzada En Drenaje, S.A. De C.V
as 5:2009cv00037
Plaintiff: Stanley Richardson
Defendant: Tecnologica Avanzada En Drenaje, S.A., De C.V. (TADSA)
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Torts - Injury None
WESBY et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00501
Plaintiff: THEODORE WESBY, ALISSA COLE, ANTHONY MAURICE HOOD and others
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, EDWIN ESPINOSA, J. NEWMAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?