Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Curcio v. CCS Medical Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01579
Plaintiff:
Frederick D Curcio, IV, United States of America, State of California and others
Defendant:
CCS Medical Inc, DEGC Enterprises (US) Inc, Highland Capital Management LP and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
United States of America v. Pharmerica Corporation
as 23-909
Plaintiff:
ABC, United States of America, The State of Alaska and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ex rel. Kaveh Askari
Defendant / Appellee:
PharMerica Corporation, Pharmacy Corporation of America, Oncomed Specialty Pharmacy, LTD., DBA Onco360 and others
Defendant:
DEF, David Froessel, Jeff Kimmel and others
SILBERSHER et al v. JANNSEN BIOTECH INC. et al
as 2:2019cv12107
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN ONCOLOGY, INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America, ex rel. et al v. MBM Solutions L.L.C., et al
as 1:2019cv01833
Defendant:
John Doe, MBM Solutions L.L.C. doing business as Avada Health, Cliff and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel., State of Alaska, ex rel., State of California, ex rel. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America v. MALLINCKRODT ARD LLC
as 1:2018cv11931
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
MALLINCKRODT PHARMACEUTICALS INC., MALLINCKRODT ARD LLC, QUESTCOR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Murray et al v. Grifols USA, LLC et al
as 8:2016cv00226
Plaintiff:
Heather Murray , State of California , State of Colorado and others
Movant:
United States of America
Defendant:
Grifols USA, LLC, Grifols Biologicals, Inc., Grifols, S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
