Cases 41 - 50 of 1,732
Michigan Spill Response, DBA; Metro Towing, LLC v. Highlight Motor Group, HL Motor Group, Inc., An International Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv13144
Plaintiff:
Michigan Spill Response, DBA; Metro Towing, LLC
Defendant:
Highlight Motor Group, HL Motor Group, Inc., An International Corporation, Old Republic General Insurance Group of the United States, A Delaware Corporation, Old Republic General Insruance Group of Canada, a Canadian Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Poe, et al v. Drummond, et al
as 23-5110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PETER POE, by and through his parents and next friends, Paula Poe and Patrick Poe, PAULA POE, PATRICK POE and others
Plaintiff:
DR. SHAUNA LAWLIS, on behalf of her patients
Defendant / Appellee:
GENTNER F DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, STEVEN KATSIS, M.D., in his official capacity as President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision, TREVOR NUTT, in his official capacity as Vice-President of the Oklahoma State Board of Medical Licensure and Supervision and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF CONNECTICUT and others
FATIR v. REDMAN et al
as 1:2023cv01098
Petitioner:
Amir Fatir
Respondent:
Walter Redman, James Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
People of the State of California v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05448
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Meta Payments, Inc. and others
Interested Party:
Conghua Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. OMNICARE, INC. et al
as 1:2011cv01326
Plaintiff:
THE STATE OF INDIANA, THE STATE OF GEORGIA, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Defendant:
PHARMERICA CORPORATION, NCS HEALTHCARE, INC., NEIGHBORCARE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Pierce v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2023cv01072
Petitioner:
Sidney-James T. Pierce
Respondent:
State of Delaware and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buckeye Power, Inc., et al v. EPA, et al
as 23-1317
Petitioner:
Buckeye Power, Inc. and Ohio Valley Electric Corporation
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Agency
Intervenor:
Appalachian Mountain Club, Ohio Environmental Council and Sierra Club
Amicus Curiae:
District of Columbia, New York City, State of Connecticut and others
United States of America v. U.S. Oncology, Inc.
as 23-1334
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of California, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of Colorado, ex rel. Omni Healthcare and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Omni Healthcare Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Oncology, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
