Cases filed in California
Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Andrew Valles v. Attorney General of the United States (S.D.N.Y) et al
as 2:2022cv06954
Petitioner: Andrew Valles
Respondent: Attorney General of the United States (S.D.N.Y), Attorney General of the State of California (S.D.Cal.) and Attorney General of the State of Utah (D.UT.)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valles v. Attorney Genereal of the United States et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01375
Plaintiff: Andrew Valles
Defendant: Attorney General of the United States, Attorney General of the State of California and Attorney General of the State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv04325
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Meta Platforms Inc.,, Within Unlimited, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg and others
Interested Party: Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, State of Alaska, State of California and others
Not Classified By Court: ByteDance Inc., Valve Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Forte Nexus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
State of Utah et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv05227
Plaintiff: State of Utah, State of New York, State of North Carolina and others
Defendant: Google LLC, Google Ireland Limited, Google Commercial Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant: Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff: Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant: Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court: Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae: American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant: Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party: Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner: Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of California et al v Wheeler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv03005
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Maryland, City of New York and others
Defendant: Andrew Wheeler, R. D. James, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Amicus Curiae: Duarte Nursery, Inc., North American Lake Management Society, Society for Ecological Restoration and others
Intervenor Defendant: State of Alaska, State of Nebraska, State of Texas and others
Petitioner: National Cattlemen's Beef Association, American Road and Transportation Builders Association, Edison Electric Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv06869
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Rust Rare Coin Inc. et al
as 4:2019mc80257
Defendant: Aleesha Rust Franklin, Rust Rare Coin Inc., Denise Gunderson Rust and others
Plaintiff: Commodity Futures Trading Commission and State of Utah Division of Securities
Cannell v. The People of the State of Utah et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01154
Defendant: Apple Computer, Inc., Jocelyn Anderson Jobs and The People of the State of Utah
Plaintiff: Thomas A. Cannell, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Alabama et al v. Endo International PLC, et al
as 3:2019cv04157
Plaintiff: State of Arkansas, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Endo Pharmaceutical Inc., Endo international PLC. and Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?