Cases 31 - 40 of 133
Nelson v. State of Virginia
as 7:2018cv00585
Respondent:
State of Virginia
Petitioner:
Marquise Leon Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abdul-Sabur v. State of Virginia
as 7:2018cv00367
Respondent:
State of Virginia
Petitioner:
Wakeel Abdul-Sabur
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. State of Virginia et al
as 3:2018cv00495
Defendant:
Tucker Pavilion Hospital and State of Virginia
Plaintiff:
Eric E. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ford v. Brown et al
as 3:2018cv00446
Plaintiff:
Willie Thomas Ford
Defendant:
Tammy Brown, Harold Clarke, State of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 131
Jenkins v. State Of Virginia et al
as 3:2018cv00203
Plaintiff:
Daryl Jenkins
Defendant:
State Of Virginia and Mark R. Herring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sundari Prasad v. FBI
as 17-7460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SUNDARI K. PRASAD
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Unknown Agent, U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, Unknown Agent, FBI RICHMOND, Unknown Agent and others
Alfonza Greenhill v. Harold Clarke
as 17-6696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFONZA HARDY GREENHILL
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the State of Virginia Department of Corrections, A. DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Corrections Operations of the State of Virginia Department of Corrections and EARL BARKSDALE, Warden of Red Onion State Prison
Thomas v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv00209
Petitioner:
Thomas Sparks Thomas
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General Of The State Of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thomas v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01076
Petitioner:
Thomas Sparks Thomas
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00795
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
