Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 30
DENNIS, JR. v. ALISSA PIERSON DENNIES ESTATE ET AL. et al
as 2:2024cv00964
Plaintiff: JAMES ALOYSIUS DENNIS, JR.
Defendant: ALISSA PIERSON DENNIES ESTATE ET AL., JAMAUSHIREE DENNIS ESTATE ST AL., MIAH RENEE DENNIS ESTATE ET AL. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
perkins et al v. garland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00766
Plaintiff: ronald oddelle perkins, Ronald Oddelle Perkins Estate et al., Kanika Glover Estate et al. and others
Defendant: merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, simon green ceo of the us dept. of ed. et al., United States Department of Education HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as SIMON GREEN, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ifeji et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff: Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji, Jazzlyn Shabera Ifeji Estate et al., Joseph Eddie Pryor Estate et al. and others
Defendant: merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL, janet louise yellen secretary of the treasury et al., United States Department of the Treasury HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as JANET LOUISE YELLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
JOHNSON et al v. HOLBROOK et al
as 2:2023cv05154
Plaintiff: ANDRE LEMAURIO JOHNSON, AMUUR MATIYN ZAAKIR EL TRUST, ANDRE LEMAURIO JOHNSON ET AL and others
Defendant: THOMAS HOLBROOK doing business as THOMAS HOLBROOK, ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY C HEIRS AND ASSIGNS, EZIKE NGO D/B/A EZIKE BGO: ILLINOIS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC HEALTH HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as EZIKE NGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
motley v. JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv10268
Plaintiff: janae rocquel motley
Defendant: JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al, Dymarion Rashad Brooks Estate et al, Derrion Rashad Brooks Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
barclay et al v. dixon et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv10272
Plaintiff: leshawn maurice barclay
Defendant: webb, jeremiah darnell Estate et al, barclay, noah sencer robert Estate et al, lynch, malakai levi Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Randall Beasley v. WV State Trooper Lowe, et al
as 23-2382
Plaintiff / Appellant: Randall Jay Beasley, a Sovereign, a Citizen of one of the Several States, et al
Defendant / Appellee: West Virginia State Trooper Lowe, West Virginia State Trooper Jan Cahill, Superintendent, Colonel for the state of West Virginia and others
Clanton v. blinken et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv04284
Plaintiff: Stanford Charles Clanton
Defendant: antony john blinken secretary of state, et al. United States doing business as Antony John Blinken, janet louise yellen secretary of treasury, et al. United States doing business as Janet Louise Yellen, merrick garland attorney general, et al. United States doing business as Merrick Garland, et al. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SCOTTO v. UNITED STATES, ET AL. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00541
Plaintiff: LIVIA M SCOTTO
Defendant: UNITED STATES, ET AL., OPM, ET AL, JESSICA M MCCLEAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Banks v. The United States, et al
as 4:2023cv00004
Plaintiff: Michael-Shawn Banks
Defendant: The United States, et al and The State of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?